Skip to content

Conversation

@MatthewSZhang
Copy link
Collaborator

Checklist

@MatthewSZhang MatthewSZhang requested a review from Copilot April 7, 2025 08:10
@MatthewSZhang MatthewSZhang self-assigned this Apr 7, 2025
@MatthewSZhang MatthewSZhang added the enhancement New feature or request label Apr 7, 2025
@MatthewSZhang MatthewSZhang added this to the 0.3.3 milestone Apr 7, 2025
Copy link

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

@MatthewSZhang MatthewSZhang linked an issue Apr 7, 2025 that may be closed by this pull request
@MatthewSZhang MatthewSZhang merged commit 993a9ed into scikit-learn-contrib:main Apr 7, 2025
4 checks passed
@MatthewSZhang MatthewSZhang deleted the narx-speed branch April 7, 2025 08:18
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (d4306c4) to head (84b2f83).
Report is 69 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##              main       #70    +/-   ##
==========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%            
==========================================
  Files            3         6     +3     
  Lines          110       603   +493     
==========================================
+ Hits           110       603   +493     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

enhancement New feature or request

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add speed test for NARX evaluation with pixi

2 participants